TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
The GST law contains a provision on anti-profiteering measure as a deterrent for trade and industry to enjoy unjust enrichment in terms of profit arising out of implementation of Goods and Services Tax in India, i.e., anti-profiteering measure would obligate the businesses to pass on the cost benefit arising out of GST implementation to their customers.
The Authority constituted by Central Government has powers to impose a penalty in case it finds that the price being charged has not been reduced consequent to reduction in rate of tax or allowance of input tax credit.
During the two years of initial transition into GST regime, Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has the mandate to ask businesses that have not passed on full benefits of reduced tax burden to consumers to make up for such benefit, with interest.
During the year 2018, the NAA has passed 28 orders against the complaints referred to it. Following is the gist of NAA Orders issued in 2018. It may be noted that out of 28 Orders, Anti-profiteering could not be established in 18 cases.
The GST law contains a provision on anti-profiteering measure as a deterrent for trade and industry to enjoy unjust enrichment in terms of profit arising out of implementation of Goods and Services Tax in India, i.e., anti-profiteering measure would obligate the businesses to pass on the cost benefit arising out of GST implementation to their customers.
The Authority constituted by Central Government has powers to impose a penalty in case it finds that the price being charged has not been reduced consequent to reduction in rate of tax or allowance of input tax credit.
During the two years of initial transition into GST regime, Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has the mandate to ask businesses that have not passed on full benefits of reduced tax burden to consumers to make up for such benefit, with interest.
During the year 2018, the NAA has passed 28 orders against the complaints referred to it. Following is the gist of NAA Orders issued in 2018. It may be noted that out of 28 Orders, Anti-profiteering could not be established in 18 cases.
S.No. | Date | Complaint Against | Issue | Anti-Profiteering | Citations |
| 1 | 27.03.2018 | M/s Vrandavaneshwree Automotive Pvt. Ltd. | Price difference on sale of car in GST regime booked in pre-GST regime | Not established | |
| 2 | 04.05.2018 | M/s KRBL Ltd | Levy of GST @5% on branded rice in GST regime | Not established | |
| 3 | 31.05.2018 | M/s Schindler India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai | Purchase of lift before and after GST, GST charged on excise duty | Not established | |
| 4 | 18.07.2018 | M/s Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore | Discount withdrawn on sale of Godrej almirah on Flipkart | Not established | |
| 5 | 07.09.2018 | M/s Sharma Trading Company | Rate of Vaseline reduced from 28% to 18%, but supplier charged 28% | Upheld | |
| 6 | 18.09.2018 | M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd. | ITC benefit on construction not passed on | Upheld |
|
| 7 | 25.09.2018 | M/s Lifestyle International Pvt. Ltd. | Rate on cosmetics reduced from 28% to 18% but MRP includes GST @28% | Upheld |
|
| 8 | 27.09.2018 | M/s N.P. Foods (Franchisee Subway India) | Prices increased due to ITC loss to restaurant, not amount to anti-profiteering | Not established |
|
| 9 | 08.10.2018 | M/s Kunj Lub Marketing Pvt. Ltd | Increase of base price of Maggie noodles on reduction of GST rate from 18% to 12% | Upheld |
|
| 10 | 29.10.2018 | M/s Amway India Enterprise | No passing of GST benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on various products | Not established for want of evidence | |
| 11 | 29.10.2018 | M/s Yum Restaurant India Pvt. Ltd (KFC) | No passing of benefit of GST rate reduction from 18% to 5% on supplies of burgers | Not established for want of evidence | (2018) 10 TMI 1615 (NAA)
|
| 12 | 16.11.2018 | M/s Fabindia | Sale of Bathing Bar and instant Drink Powder on old MRP even after GST fixed @ 18% | Not established | |
| 13 | 16.11.2018 | M/s Hard Castle (McDonald’s) | No passing of benefit of GST rate reduction from 18% to 5% on supplies of burgers | Upheld | |
| 14 | 28.11.2018 | M/s Theco India Pvt. Ltd. (Milling Machine Furnace) | No passing of benefit of GST rate reduction and ITC on purchase of important machinery | Upheld | |
| 15 | 06.12.2018 | M/s J.P. and Sons (Johnson & Johnson Baby) | Charge of same MRP after tax reduction | Upheld | |
| 16 | 07.12.2018 | M/s Harish Bakers & Confectioners Pvt. Ltd. (Cadbury Dairy Milk Chocolate) | No passing of benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18 % on chocolates | Upheld | |
| 17 | 17.12.2018 | M/s Landmark Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (Honda Car) | Allegation of not passing of benefit of ITC on sale of Honda Car | Not established | |
| 18 | 17.12.2018 | M/s Zeba Distributors, Immanuel Stores (Eastern Meat Masala) | Allegation of not passing of benefit of GST rate reduction | Not established | |
| 19 | 24.12.2018 | M/s Hindustan Unilever Ltd. | Not passing of benefit of tax rate reduction & not changing MRP of various FMCG products | Upheld | |
| 20 | 24.12.2018 | M/s Asian Granito India Ltd. | Allegation of not passing of benefit of tax rate reduction on supply of tiles | Not established | |
| 21 | 24.12.2018 | M/s Peps Industries Pvt. Ltd. | Allegation of not passing of benefit of tax rate reduction on supply of mattresses. | Not established | |
| 22 | 24.12.2018 | M/s Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. | Allegation of not passing benefit of tax rate reduction on sale of Panasonic LED | Not established | |
| 23 | 24.12.2018 | M/s Impact Clothing Co. | Allegation of profiteering on sale of garments | Not established | |
| 24 | 27.12.2018 | M/s Raj & Company | Allegation of not passing benefit of tax rate reduction and not changing MRP of various FMCG products | Upheld |
|
| 25 | 27.12.2018 | M/s Janson | Allegation of not passing benefit of tax rate reduction on supply of Lungi | Not established | |
| 26 | 27.12.2018 | M/s Lorenzo Vitrified Tiles Pvt. Ltd. | Allegation of not passing benefit of tax rate reduction on supply of Mirror Series Tiles | Not established | |
| 27 | 27.12.2018 | M/s Ahuja Radios | Allegation of not passing benefit of tax rate reduction on supply of Ceiling / wall speaker | Not established | |
| 28 | 27.12.2018 | M/s Asian Paints Ltd. | Allegation of not passing benefit of tax rate reduction on supply of paint product | Not established |