Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

MANDATORY FIXED PRE-DEPOSIT: A SIGN OF RELIEF TO APPELLANTS ?

Pradeep Jain
New Rules Require Tax Appellants to Pre-Deposit 7.5% for First Appeal, 10% for Second, Capping at 10 Crore The article discusses the mandatory fixed pre-deposit requirement for appellants in tax-related cases, highlighting its implications. Previously, appellants could request a waiver if pre-deposits caused undue hardship. The amended Section 35F now mandates a pre-deposit of 7.5% for first-stage appeals and 10% for second-stage appeals, capped at 10 crore. This change is seen as beneficial for appellants with strong cases but lacking proof of financial hardship, potentially reducing appeal costs and expediting case resolution. However, concerns remain about the burden on appellants facing large demands, potentially hindering their legal rights. (AI Summary)

INTRODUCTION

Filing of appeal is a mechanism available to the assessees who are aggrieved by the orders passed by the adjudicating authority or the higher appellate authorities. However, mere filing of appeal is not sufficient and there is a condition of making pre-deposit of duty or tax amount involved in the case. Pre-deposit is a certain amount of duty or tax amount that is required to be paid beforehand to the government exchequer in order to get the case heard before the appellate authority. The amount of pre-deposit can differ under various circumstances depending upon the merits of the case and financial position of the assessee.

Moreover, litigation is increasing and it has been reported that case pendency at tribunal level is immense. The tribunal was busy in hearing the stay applications or the extension in already granted stay order. There was all around demand from the trade that the pre-deposit before filing of stay application should be waived.

EARLIER PROVISION :-

According to section 35F, Where any appeal, decision or order appealed against under this chapter relates to any duty demanded or any penalty levied under this act then the person desirous of appealing against such decision or order shall deposit with the adjudicating authority the amount of duty demanded or penalty levied. If Comm. (A) or Appellate tribunal is of the view that such deposit would cause an undue hardship to such person then such authority would dispense with such deposit subject to conditions as he or it may deem fit.

SUBSTITUTED PROVISION :-

Section 35F is being substituted and the amended language prescribes a mandatory fixed pre-deposit of 7.5% of duty demanded or penalty imposed or both for filing appeal with Commissioner(A) or the tribunal at the first stage and another 10% of duty demanded or penalty imposed or both for filing second stage appeal before the tribunal, where any appeal, decision or order appealed against under this chapter relates to any duty demanded or any penalty levied under this act. The amount of pre-deposit payable would be subject to a ceiling of 10 crore.

Duty demanded shall include –

Amount determined under section 11D

Amount of erroneous cenvat credit taken

Amount payable under section 57CC of central excise rules, 1944

Amount payable under rule 6 of cenvat credit rules, 2004

Interest payable under this Act or rules made thereunder.

Implication of amendment:-

The fixation of percentage of pre-deposit is a sign of relief to the appellants. This amendment is beneficial particularly to those assessees who have very strong merits but they are insisted to make the pre-deposit as they have no proof to prove the financial hardship. Despite strong merits of the case, the assessees are compelled to make the pre-deposit which results into nothing but hampering their liquidity. Also, the amount pre-deposited by them is ultimately refunded to them. This provision will also benefit those innocent appellants who have been made party to case as abettor eventhough had no active involvement and were ignorant of the frauds. During our practice, we have come across couple of such cases where the case covered persons as abettors who were small town people with negligible amount of assets. Since they were not filing any return, no documentary proof was available w.r.t. their income; thus, it was not possible to prove the undue hardship also. This amended provision is going to benefit such people alongwith all other types of appellants, thereby reducing the cost of filing the appeal as the concept of filing the stay application will reduce drastically. Thus, there will be savings in precious time of appellate authorities which will ultimately lead to early disposal of appeals.

But this has other implications also. It is normally seen that the department authorities issue huge demands on well settled issues and imposes a huge penalty. In such case, the poor litigant will find it difficult to even deposit the 7.5% or 10% of the demand. Hence, he will not be able to file the appeal and the complete demand will be confirmed. This will deprive him of his legal right also. The trade and industry will once again demand to completely waive the pre-deposit condition and hear the appeal itself. If it is confirmed than the department has every right to recover the same.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
RadheyShyam Mangal on Jul 11, 2014

Dear Pradeepji,

As you well aware that 80% to 90% of cases in indirect taxes are fake and ultimately the department loses the cases at Cestat. The amount of demand and penalty is generally imposed in Adjudication, is on maximum extent and therefore this provision of compulsory deposit is very harsh one. The most of cases are on interpretation and on already settled issue and pre-deposit of even 10% of demand and penalty is harsh one particularly for service providers who are generally small one. In my opinion, the issue involving normal demand should exempted and only cases involving suppression can have such provision. In my opinion provision for compulsory deposit of even 10% in all cases is bad law.

regards

CA R S Mangal

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles