Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

LIMITATION- LAW AS ON 1ST APRIL OF ASSESSMENT YEAR WILL APPLY A FAVORABLE VIEW IS ADOPTED.

DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Court Rules Pre-Amendment Limitation Period Applies to Section 143(2) Notices, Invalidating Tax Authority's Notice The article discusses a legal issue concerning the application of a limitation period for issuing notices under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Until March 31, 2007, notices could be issued within twelve months from the end of the month in which the return was filed. An amendment effective April 1, 2008, reduced this period to six months from the end of the financial year. In a case involving the assessment year 2007-08, the court ruled in favor of the taxpayer, holding that the pre-amendment limitation period applied, rendering the notice issued by the tax authorities invalid. (AI Summary)

Relevant links:

Proviso to section 143(2) (ii) as it stood till 31.03.2007 and w.e.f. 01.04.2008 providing for limitation.

Tulsi Food Products Versus DCIT  2012 -TMI - 212714 - Allahabad High Court

CIT vs. Shaan Finance (P) Ltd (1998 -TMI - 5659 - SUPREME Court )

Premier Cable Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income- Tax, (1999 -TMI - 5734 - SUPREME Court)

The explanatory notes to the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008 vide Circular No. 1/2009 

As per proviso to S.143(2)(ii) till assessment year 2007-08 a notice u/s 143(2) to commence scrutiny assessment proceedings could be issued within twelve months from end of the month in which return was filed u/s 139.

From 01.04.2008 this proviso was amended and now it provides that notice can be issued within six month from the end of the financial year in which return was filed u/s 139.

Tulsi Food Products Versus DCIT  2012 -TMI - 212714 - Allahabad High Court

In this case assessment year involved is assessment year 2007-08, that is prior to amendment of the said proviso. The question arose was whether the proviso as it stood till  31.03.2007 will apply or the proviso as amended w.e.f. 01.04.2008 will apply.

The normal rule is that in case of tax law, the any provision which is in force as on 1st day of April of assessment year will apply. Therefore , assessee pleaded that limitation as stood before amendment will apply while considering income of assessment year 2007-08. Therefore, as per assessee, the time limit to issue notice u/s 139(2) was till 30.07.2008  and not 30.09.2008.

Revenue pleaded that the proviso is a procedural provision, the return was filed on 24.07.2007 in the previous year 2007-08, therefore limitation, as per amended proviso, to issue notice was till 30.09.2008 and not 30.07.2008 as pleaded by assessee.   

The High court accepted the contention of the assessee and held that the notice u/s 143(2) was belated by less than two months and once the notice was invalid the assessment order passed pursuant of invalid / time barred notice was also invalid.

 

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles