Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

THE BASIS OF CHARGE-- THE SOUL OF TAXATION

Sadanand Bulbule
Valid charging provision for tax levy-GST supply, reverse charge, customs import/export, CST inter-State sale-collection fails without authority Tax liability is asserted to arise only through a valid charging provision, consistent with Article 265, and the absence or defect of such a provision renders the collection machinery inoperative, thereby invalidating levy or collection without authority of law. Charging formulations are contrasted: income tax is described as levied 'subject to the provisions of the Act,' enabling treaty-based relief; GST is described as imposed on 'supply' and extended through reverse charge by deeming the recipient liable; customs duty is described as arising on import/export movement; and central sales tax is described as levied on inter-State sales with collection entrusted to the State of origin. A sustainable levy is stated to require identification of the taxable event, taxable person, rate, and measure, failing which the levy collapses. (AI Summary)

The Bedrock of Sovereignty: The 'Basis of Charge' and the Soul of Taxation.

In the grand architecture of a nation’s economy, the power to tax is the most potent instrument of sovereignty. However, this power is not absolute. It is anchored in a profound constitutional promise. Article 265, which declares that no tax shall be levied or collected except by the authority of law. This 'authority' is the Charging Section—the narrow gateway through which the state must pass before it can touch the wealth of its citizens. While the rest of a tax statute provides the 'machinery'—the gears, wires, and tools of collection—the charging section is the spark of life. Without it, the machinery is nothing more than cold, hollow iron.

A symphony of statutes: Comparative charging mandates. To understand the 'Basis of Charge,' one must appreciate the nuance with which the legislature crafts the language of obligation.

1.The Income Tax Act, 2025:

A conditional covenant Section 4 of this Act is a masterpiece of legal prudence. Unlike other taxes, it is specifically conditional, stating that the levy is 'subject to the provisions of this Act.'  The Insight: This phrasing is the bridge between domestic law and global equity. Because India operates on a world stage, this conditionality allows the Act to breathe—honuoring international treaties (DTAA) and OECD standards that may offer relief to global entities. It is a charging section that recognizes the world is borderless.

2. The GST & Customs Acts: The direct mandate. In the realm of indirect taxation, the charge is often more immediate and objective:

CGST Act, 2017 (Section 9): A broad-spectrum levy on the 'supply' of goods and services or both. It also introduces the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM), a sophisticated legal fiction where the recipient steps into the shoes of the supplier to fulfill the sovereign's demand.

3. Customs Act, 1962 (Section 12): A sentinel at the border, it attaches the tax liability to the physical movement of goods across the national frontier.

4.Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Section 9): A unique hybrid that empowers the Union to levy tax on inter-state commerce while entrusting the State of origin with the mantle of collection.

The four pillars of a sustainable levy:

For a tax to hold the weight of judicial scrutiny, it must rest upon four foundational pillars. As the Hon’ble Supreme Court illuminated in Govind Saran Ganga Saran Versus Commissioner Of Sales Tax And Others - 1985 (4) TMI 65 - Supreme Court, if any one of these pillars is fractured, the entire levy collapses.

A. The Taxable Event: The precise moment the liability is born (e.g., the 'supply' or 'income accrual').

 B. The Taxable Person: The specific entity identified by law to answer the call of the treasury.

C. The Rate: The mathematical expression of the state's share.

D. The Measure: The value or 'quantum' upon which the rate is applied.

The Modern Sage: The Role of the Adjudicator.

We have moved from an era of brick-and-mortar trade to a digital renaissance. Today, value is created in the 'cloud,' through algorithms, and across invisible service networks. In this landscape, tax authorities can no longer function as mere bureaucrats; they must become quasi-judicial philosophers.

The call for clarity and courage: Taxation is not an act of extraction; it is a process of law. When an authority levies tax based on superficial and completely misconceived 'opinions' rather than empirical evidence, they violate the spirit of Article 265. So  they have to come out of dark rooms and must emerge from traditional silos and embrace the complexity of modern business.

The poison of 'toxic interpretation': When the law is stretched beyond its intent to meet revenue targets, it kills the 'benign object' of the legislature and suffocates the honest stakeholder.

Conclusion:

The path forward--The 'Basis of Charge' is the point where the law meets the taxpayer’s life. It requires the adjudicator to act with clarity, courage, and confidence. By honoring the foundational requirements of the charging section, the adjudicator does more than collect revenue—it upholds the rule of law and protect the economic heartbeat of the nation. It is time to move away from the shadows of needless litigation and toward a future where the taxman and the taxpayer stand on the common ground of certain, fair, and transparent law.

“ Organic adjudication alone fetches organic revenue”.

This profound philosophy strikes at the very heart of tax jurisprudence. 'Organic adjudication' signifies that the process of levying tax must be natural, rooted in the soil of facts, and nourished by the clear water of the law—rather than being a 'forced' or 'synthetic' extraction.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles