Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Time barring of 6 years for refund application is only for “Tax Paid” and not when “payments are made” when income itself is exempt [Sec 237 of ITA’61 Vs Sec 431 of ITA’25]

Vivek Jalan
Refund claim for amounts remitted as 'tax' on exempt income: Section 237 refund allowed, six-year Circular bar inapplicable Section 237 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 431 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 confer entitlement to refund only where 'tax paid' (or treated as paid) for a year exceeds the amount properly chargeable. CBDT Circular No. 9/2015 prescribes that no condonation application for refund (or carry-forward loss) shall be entertained beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The Gujarat High Court in Lt. Col. Nikhil Subodh Gajjar (Retd) held that where income is exempt and no tax is leviable, any amount remitted as 'tax' lacks authority under Article 265 and is not 'tax paid' for section 237; consequently, the six-year bar in Circular No. 9/2015 does not apply to such refund claims. (AI Summary)

Section 237 of ITA’61 provides that – “237. If any person satisfies the 1[Assessing] Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under this Act for that year, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess.”

The same is mirrored by Section 431 of ITA’25 which provides that – “431. Refunds. If any person satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any tax year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under this Act for that year, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess.”

One must understand that as per Article 265 of The Constitution Taxes cannot be collected without any authority of Law. Incase a payment is made where no tax is payable, then the nature of the payment does not remain taxes at all. This brings us to the point that for refund of such payments, there should be no Limitation period as such as held in the case of Lt. Col. Nikhil Subodh Gajjar Retd Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Ahmedabad 3 & Anr. - 2025 (11) TMI 1772 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Circular 9/2015 [F.NO.312/22/2015-OT], DATED 9-6-2015 specifies the time period for condonation of delay in filing refund claim. It states inter-alia as follows -

SECTION 119 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961  INCOME-TAX AUTHORITIES - INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REFUND CLAIM AND CLAIM OF CARRY FORWARD LOSSES UNDER SECTION 119(2)(b)CIRCULAR 9/2015 [F.NO.312/22/2015-OT], DATED 9-6-2015

3. No condonation application for claim of refund/loss shall be entertained beyond six years from the end of the assessment year for which such application/claim is made. This limit of six years shall be applicable to all authorities having powers to condone the delay as per the above prescribed monetary limits, including the Board. A condonation application should be disposed of within six months from the end of the month in which the application is received by the competent authority, as far as possible.”

However, Circular No.9/2015 which prohibits entertaining an application for claim of refund/loss beyond six years from the end of relevant assessment year would not be applicable incase a petitioner is entitled to the refund of the payment made as taxes as disability pension received by the petitioner is falling under exempt income and therefore, the petitioner is not liable to pay any tax on such disability pension.
If the same analogy is applied for say Non-Profit Organisations, Trusts, etc, it means that the application of refunds has no time limit.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles