Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Notification extending time limit not applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-18

Bimal jain
Limitation period under Section 73 found expired; retrospective notification inapplicable, resulting in orders being quashed as time barred. The court held that the three year limitation under Section 73 expired before the retrospective notification came into effect, so the notification could not extend the time for passing assessment or recovery orders for the impugned period; accordingly, the departmental orders were beyond the prescribed time limit and were quashed. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/S A.V. PHARMA THRU. ITS PROP. SMT. MADHU VOHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX LKO. AND 2 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT allowed the writ petition and quashed the order issued by the Department for FY 2017-2018 stating that the orders have been issued beyond the prescribed time limit thereby holding that as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”) for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, thus, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.

Facts:

M/s. AV Pharma (“the Petitioner”) through its Proprietor, filed a writ petition for setting aside of order dated October 05, 2024 issued in Form GST DRC-13 and December 02, 2023 issued in Form GST DRC-07(“the Impugned Orders”) for the period of FY 2017-2018 (“the Impugned Period”) on the ground that the Impugned Orders passed are barred by sub-section (10) of Section 73 of the CGST Act, as the said Impugned Orders have been passed beyond the prescribed time limit, i.e. three years from the due date of filing of annual return, ending on February 05, 2023.

Issue:

Whether Notification extending time limit would be applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-2018?

Held:

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/S A.V. PHARMA THRU. ITS PROP. SMT. MADHU VOHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX LKO. AND 2 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Noted that, for the justification of time limit, reliance was placed upon State Notification No. 515/XI-2-23-9(47)/17-T.C.215-U.P.Act-1-2017-Order-(273)-2023 dated April 24, 2023(“the Notification”), which has been given retrospective effect only w.e.f. March 31, 2023 which has been adopted from notification issued by Central Government bearing Notification No. 09/2023 – Central Tax dated March 31, 2023, thereby extending the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 for the Impugned Period till December 31, 2023.
  • Further Noted that, as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.
  • Further Opined that, the Impugned Orders are beyond the prescribed time lime under Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, as applicable during the Impugned Period.
  • Held that, the Impugned Orders are quashed and the writ petition is allowed.

 (Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles