Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Orders signed by same officer in dual capacity not maintainable.

Bimal jain
Dual-capacity signatures invalidated: orders signed by same officer set aside and remitted for fresh consideration. Orders under the CGST framework bearing signatures of the same officer in dual roles were quashed because the Department could not explain why the same individual signed as State Tax Officer (Data Analytics) and Commercial Tax Officer; the orders were set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s S.R.S. Construction v. The State Tax Officer (Data Analytics) [2024 (7) TMI 1348 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] set aside the orders which have been signed by the same officer in dual capacity, holding that such orders are liable to be set aside.

Facts:

M/s S.R.S. Construction (“the Petitioner”) had challenged the Assessment Orders dated February 23, 2024 (“the Impugned Order”) passed under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”) for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22 (“the Impugned Period”) Impugned Orders were passed by the same individual in the capacity as State Tax Officer (Data Analytics) (Intelligence Wing), Virudhunagar and Commercial Tax Officer.

Held:

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of [2024 (7) TMI 1348 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] taking into consideration the fact that the Department is not in a position to clarify as why the same officer has signed the respective Impugned Order under two different heads, thereby, the Impugned Orders was set aside the matter was remitted back for reconsideration.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles