TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of R.S. MARKETING AND LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENGALURU - 2024 (6) TMI 889 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, set aside the adjudication order and remanded the matter back for reconsideration wherein the guidelines prescribed in Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated December 27, 2022(“the Circular”) relating to discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A for claiming of ITC has not been complied with.
Facts:
R.S Marketing and Logistics Private Limited (“the Petitioner”), filed a writ petition against an order dated May 2, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) passed by the Revenue department (“the Respondent”) guidelines prescribed inthe Circular relating to discrepancies in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A for claiming of ITC
Issue:
Whether the Petitioner entitled to an opportunity of hearing when the procedure prescribed in the Circular relating to discrepancy in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A has not been complied with?
Held:
The Hon’ble Karnataka High court inR.S. MARKETING AND LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENGALURU - 2024 (6) TMI 889 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURTheld as under:
- Noted that, the Circular is made applicable specifically w.r.t. FY 2017-2018 and procedure has been prescribed in case where the ITC claimed is less than five lakh rupees.
- Opined that, the procedure prescribed in the Circular has not been complied with by the Respondent.
- Held that, the Impugned Order is set aside and remitted the matter back for reconsideration.
(Author can be reached at [email protected])