Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Assessee entitled to refund of the amount recovered as the appellate tribunal has yet not been constituted

Bimal jain
Company Wins Refund Due to Lack of Appellate Tribunal; Must Provide Bank Guarantee for Appeal The Karnataka High Court ruled that a company is entitled to a refund of the amount recovered by the Revenue Department due to the absence of a constituted appellate tribunal. The court allowed the company to file an appeal once the tribunal is established and directed the refund, contingent upon the company providing a bank guarantee. This decision follows a writ petition challenging an earlier order and requesting an appeal within an extended limitation period. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarified the procedure for taxpayers to stay recovery by filing an undertaking and pre-depositing the required amount. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in CULTGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENF) 53, SOUTH ZONE BENGALURU - 2024 (5) TMI 309 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, granted the liberty to the Assessee to file the appeal before the GSTAT as and when it is constituted. Also, The Hon’ble High Court directed the Revenue Department to refund the amount recovered from the Assessee subject to the furnishing of bank guarantee.

Facts:

Cultgear Private Ltd. (“the Petitioner”), filed a writ petition against order dated September 16, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) seeking direction that the Petitioner be permitted to file the appeal against the Impugned Order within the extended period of limitation as and when the appellate tribunal is constituted. The Petitioner also prayed for direction that the refund of the amount recovered be sanctioned for which the Petitioner is willing to furnish the bank guarantee.

Issue:

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to refund of the amount recovered as the appellate tribunal has yet not been constituted?

Held:

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in CULTGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENF) 53, SOUTH ZONE BENGALURU - 2024 (5) TMI 309 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT granted the liberty to the Petitioner to file the appeal before the GSTAT as and when it is constituted. The Hon’ble High Court granted the refund to the Petitioner subject to the furnishing of bank guarantee.

Our Comments:

The CBIC vide Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST dated July 11, 2024 clarified that the taxpayer needs to file an undertaking/ declaration with the jurisdictional proper officer that he will file appeal against the said order of the appellate authority before the Appellate Tribunal, as and when it comes into operation, within the timelines mentioned in section 112 of the CGST Act read with Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 dated 03.12.2019. On providing the said undertaking and on payment of an amount equal to the amount of pre-deposit as per the procedure prescribed, the recovery of the remaining amount of confirmed demand as per the order of the appellate authority will stand stayed as per provisions of sub-section (9) of section 112 of CGST Act.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles