Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation

Bimal jain
Writ Petition Dismissed: Court Upholds Limitation Period for Appeals Under CGST Act, Citing Supreme Court Precedent. The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging an assessment order under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the petition was not maintainable since the petitioner did not utilize the available appeal remedy within the limitation period. The petitioner allowed the order to become final before seeking relief through a writ petition. The court relied on a Supreme Court judgment, which established that writ petitions are not permissible when appeals are not filed within the prescribed timeframe, thus barring the petition by limitation. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of M/S THEKEDAR NAND LAL SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS - 2024 (5) TMI 973 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURTdismissed the writ petition and held that, the writ petition against Assessment Order is not maintainable when remedy of appeal is not availed during the period of limitation.

Facts:

M/s. Thekedar Nand Lal Sharma (“the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition challenging the Show Cause Notice dated October 28, 2022 (“the Impugned SCN”) issued by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) and order dated March 2, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”).

Aggrieved by the Impugned Order and SCN issued, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court.

Issue:

Whether Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation?

Held:

The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in M/S THEKEDAR NAND LAL SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS - 2024 (5) TMI 973 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Noted that, the Petitioner did not file the appeal and allowed the Impugned Order passed during the proceeding to become final and thereafter approached the Hon’ble High Court by way of filing writ petition against the imposition of tax, interest and penalty.
  • Further Noted that, The Petitioner deliberately chose not to file the appeal and avail the remedy of appeal prescribed under Section 107 of the CGST Act but waited for the prescribed period of limitation for filing of appeal to expire.
  • Relying upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU, KAKINADA & ORS. VERSUS M/S. GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED - 2020 (5) TMI 149 - SUPREME COURTwherein it was held that, writ petition cannot be filed for granting of relief against the assessment order passed when the appeal could not be filed within the prescribed period, therefore, being barred by limitation., the Hon’ble High Court opined that the writ petition is not maintainable.
  • Held that, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles