Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation

The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of M/S THEKEDAR NAND LAL SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS - 2024 (5) TMI 973 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURTdismissed the writ petition and held that, the writ petition against Assessment Order is not maintainable when remedy of appeal is not availed during the period of limitation.

Facts:

M/s. Thekedar Nand Lal Sharma (“the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition challenging the Show Cause Notice dated October 28, 2022 (“the Impugned SCN”) issued by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) and order dated March 2, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”).

Aggrieved by the Impugned Order and SCN issued, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court.

Issue:

Whether Writ Petition against Assessment Order not maintainable when remedy of appeal not availed during the period of limitation?

Held:

The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in M/S THEKEDAR NAND LAL SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS - 2024 (5) TMI 973 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT held as under:

• Noted that, the Petitioner did not file the appeal and allowed the Impugned Order passed during the proceeding to become final and thereafter approached the Hon’ble High Court by way of filing writ petition against the imposition of tax, interest and penalty.
• Further Noted that, The Petitioner deliberately chose not to file the appeal and avail the remedy of appeal prescribed under Section 107 of the CGST Act but waited for the prescribed period of limitation for filing of appeal to expire.
• Relying upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU, KAKINADA & ORS. VERSUS M/S. GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED - 2020 (5) TMI 149 - SUPREME COURTwherein it was held that, writ petition cannot be filed for granting of relief against the assessment order passed when the appeal could not be filed within the prescribed period, therefore, being barred by limitation., the Hon’ble High Court opined that the writ petition is not maintainable.
• Held that, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])