Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Audit wing of SGST Authority shall keep all proceedings in abeyance if the subject matter is pending before the CGST Authority

Bimal jain
SGST must pause actions if discrepancies are under CGST review, rules court. Await CGST decision first. The Calcutta High Court ruled that the State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) Authority must suspend proceedings if the matter is under review by the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Authority. In this case, the appellant received an audit memo from the SGST Authority highlighting discrepancies, which were already addressed in a show cause notice by the CGST Department. Despite the appellant's response, the SGST Authority continued its proceedings. The court directed the SGST Authority to halt its actions and await the CGST Authority's adjudication on the discrepancies. The appeal and related applications were disposed of accordingly. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of MR. MAHABIR PRASAD KEDIA, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. SANJAY CASTING & ENG. CO. VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, HOWRAH AND KADAMTALA CHARGE & ORS.  - 2024 (1) TMI 1098 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT held that the Audit Wing of the State Goods and Services Tax (“SGST”) Authority should keep the proceedings in abeyance if the subject matter was pending before the Central Goods and Services Tax (“CGST”) Department.

Mr. Mahabir Prasad Kedia (“the Appellant”) was issued an audit memo in which several discrepancies were pointed out. The Appellant on receiving the said audit notice informed the SGSTAuthority that over the same issue a show cause notice (“the SCN”) had been issued by the anti-evasion wing of CGST Department dated March 28, 2023 (“the Impugned SCN”) for the financial years 2017-2018 to 2021-2022 wherein all the points as mentioned in the audit memo were considered and the same was under adjudication. The Appellant gave a reply to the Impugned SCN on May 04, 2023. The matter was now pending for adjudication. Over such a reply given by the Appellant, the audit wing of the SGST Authority was of the opinion that it was not clear from the reply given by the Appellant that the discrepancy was settled. The audit authority failed to take note of the submission made by the Appellant and the subject matter was pending for adjudication by the CGST Authority, who has issued the Impugned SCN on which the reply was submitted by the Appellant on May 02, 2023. 

Therefore, the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court held that the audit wing of the SGST Authority should keep the matter abeyance so far as the discrepancy note is concerned. The authority now has issued an SCN dated December 29, 2023, since the discrepancy pointed out by the Audit Wing of the SGST Authority is the subject matter of adjudication by the CGST Authority. According to the Impugned SCN, the audit wing of the SGST Authority should not proceed. Accordingly, the appeal along with the connected application and the writ petition was disposed of by directing the audit wing of the SGST Authority to keep in abeyance all proceedings in respect of the discrepancy note no.3 alone including the show cause notice dated December 29, 2023, and abide by the adjudication order to be passed by the CGST Authority, on the Impugned SCN.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles