Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Orders to be set aside in cases wherein the Reason for Cancellation of GST Registration is not mentioned

Bimal jain
GST Registration Cancellation Overturned Due to Lack of Specific Reasons; Court Orders Restoration in Business Entity Case. The Delhi High Court ruled that the cancellation of GST registration without specifying reasons, such as fraud or misstatement, is unjustified. In the case involving a business entity, the court found that the cancellation was based solely on the shop being closed, with no substantial evidence of wrongdoing. The show cause notice lacked detailed reasons, and the order was issued without awaiting a response from the business. Consequently, the court set aside the order and directed the restoration of the GST registration, emphasizing the need for clear and specific grounds for such actions. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of VAB APPAREL LLP VERSUS COMMISSIONER, DELHI GST AND ORS. - 2023 (11) TMI 598 - DELHI HIGH COURTheld that without specifying any particular reason and explanation for the cancellation of GST Registration by means of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, also there is no explanation as to why the buyers and suppliers have been found to be suspicious. Merely because the Petitioner’s shop was found closed, absent anything more, is not a ground for cancellation of the Petitioner’s GST registration. Thus, the impugned order is set aside, the Respondents have been directed to restore the GST Registration and the writ petition stands disposed of.

Facts:

M/s. VAB Apparel LLP (“the Petitioner”) received a Show Cause Notice (“the SCN”) dated May 19, 2022, for cancellation of the GST Registration, with effect from March 03, 2018, for the reason that the Petitioner obtained registration by fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. And GST Registration was suspended with effect from the date of issuance of the SCN. Thereafter, the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) without waiting for a reply against the SCN from the Petitioner, issued the Order dated May 23, 2022 (“the Impugned Order”).

The reasons stated in the Impugned Order are that the Petitioner’s response to the query was not proper; no documentary evidence had been produced by the taxpayer; and none had appeared for a personal hearing. The Impugned Order neither refers to any fraud that was found to have been committed by the petitioner nor mentions any misstatement allegedly made by the Petitioner.

Hence, aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court for quashing and setting aside the impugned order.

Issue:

Whether the GST registration be cancelled, without specifying the reason and explanation in the SCN?

Held:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of VAB APPAREL LLP VERSUS COMMISSIONER, DELHI GST AND ORS. - 2023 (11) TMI 598 - DELHI HIGH COURTheld as under:

  • Observed that, the Impugned Order neither refers to any fraud that was found to have been committed by the petitioner nor mentions any misstatement allegedly made by the Petitioner. 
  • Opined that, there is no explanation as to why the buyers and suppliers have been found to be suspicious. Merely because the Petitioner’s shop was found closed, absent anything more, is not a ground for cancellation of Petitioner’s GST registration.
  • Directed that, the Respondent to restore the GST Registration forthwith. 
  • Held that, the Impugned Order is to be set aside and the writ petition is allowed.

Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles