Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Stayed the demand of penalty and interest in absence of GST Appellate Tribunal

Bimal jain
Stay of penalty and interest conditioned on full tax deposit while awaiting constitution of the Appellate Tribunal for appeal. The court ordered suspension of the demand for penalty and interest during the writ's pendency, conditional on the taxpayer depositing the entire tax amount demanded within fifteen days; it noted the taxpayer's desire to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal which is not yet constituted and observed that admission of an appeal would require deposit of a prescribed portion of the disputed tax. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Orissa High Court in PRAFULLA KUMAR SAHOO VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CT & GST ODISHA, BANIJYAKAR BHAWAN & OTHERS - 2023 (5) TMI 1145 - ORISSA HIGH COURThad stayed the demand of penalty and interest raised by the Revenue Department, during the pendency of writ petition, subject to the condition that the assessee deposits the entire amount of tax demanded within a period of 15 days, since the assessee wanted to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching GST Appellate Tribunal (“GSTAT”).

Facts:

This petition has been filed by Prafulla Kumar Sahoo (“the Petitioner”) challenging the Order dated April 12, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) passed the by Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) (“the First Appellate Authority”) demanding the amount of penalty and interest, wherein, the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) had been rejected.

The Petitioner contended that the Petitioner is not liable to pay the tax and penalty against the Impugned Order as the Petitioner had already deposited 10% of the demanded tax amount before the First Appellate Authority and there is no GSTAT constituted as on date.

Issue:

Whether the demand of interest and penalty is liable to be stayed in absence of the GSTAT?

Held:

The Hon’ble High Court in PRAFULLA KUMAR SAHOO VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CT & GST ODISHA, BANIJYAKAR BHAWAN & OTHERS - 2023 (5) TMI 1145 - ORISSA HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Issued notice to the Revenue Department.
  • Noted that, in case the Petitioner wants to avail the remedy by preferring appeal before the GSTAT, the Petitioner would be liable to pay 20% of the disputed tax for consideration of its appeal.
  • Observed that, the Petitioner wants to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching GSTAT, which has not yet been constituted.
  • Held that, the amount of penalty and interest demanded shall remain stayed during pendency of the petition, subject to the condition that the Petitioner deposits the entire amount of tax demanded within a period of 15 days.

Relevant provision:

Section 112(1) of the CGST Act:

“Appeals to Appellate Tribunal

112. (1) Any person aggrieved by an order passed against him under section 107 or section 108 of this Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order within three months from the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the person preferring the appeal.”

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles