Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

GST amount to be adjusted if there is an issue of mismatch in GST Return with Bank Statement

Bimal jain
Company Wins Against Revenue Dept for Misinterpretation of GSTR-09; Court Orders GST Adjustment for FY 2018-19 The Allahabad High Court ruled in favor of a company against the Revenue Department, which had misinterpreted the company's GST return (FORM GSTR-09). The court found that the department incorrectly assessed the company's turnover and failed to consider the full form, leading to a mismatch with the bank statement. The court ordered the department to adjust the GST amount for the financial year 2018-19 and release the security amount held under an interim order. The initial and appellate orders against the company were set aside due to this misreading. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in VRIDDHI INFRATECH INDIA PVT. LTD. THRU. AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ANNE SANDEEP, PROJECT DIRECTOR VERSUS COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. LUCKNOW AND 2 OTHERS - 2023 (2) TMI 1129 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURThas set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department, on the grounds, that the Revenue Department and the Appellate Authority have committed the misreading of FORM GSTR-09filed by the assessee. Directed the Revenue Department to adjust the GST amount deposited by the Petitioner.

Facts:

Vriddhi Infratech India Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) was issued a Notice (“the Notice”) dated June 23, 2020 as per Section 61 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) claiming that the Petitioner’s annual return, filed in the FORM GSTR-09 dated January 30, 2020, showed a turnover of INR 129.52 lakhs, which did not match its bank statement.

The Petitioner has challenged the Order-in-Original dated June 4, 2021 (“the OIO”) passed, as per Section 61 of the CGST Act and Section 74 of the CGST Act and the Order-in-Appeal (“the OIA”) dated October 26, 2021 on the grounds, that the GST amount which could not be deposited in the Financial Year (“F.Y”) 2017-18, but in June, 2018, to be adjusted in the F.Y 2018-19.

The Petitioner contended that, the very basis of the Notice is wrong, as its FORM GSTR-09. shows the turnover amount of INR 129.52 lakhs with regard to supply made to unregistered persons under the B2C Category and the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) did not consider the entire form, which at its end shows the total turnover of INR 20,37,13,502.00 lakhs through FORM GSTR-09. in the F.Y 2017-18.

Issue:

Whether the Respondent has misread the FORM-GSTR-09 filed by the Petitioner?

Held:

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in VRIDDHI INFRATECH INDIA PVT. LTD. THRU. AUTHORISED SIGNATORY ANNE SANDEEP, PROJECT DIRECTOR VERSUS COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. LUCKNOW AND 2 OTHERS - 2023 (2) TMI 1129 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURTheld as under:

  • Observed that, the Respondent and the Appellate Authority have committed the misreading of FORM GSTR-09.
  • Directed the Respondent to adjust the GST amount deposited by the Petitioner in the F.Y 2018-19.
  • Directed the Respondent to release the security amount deposited under the interim order.
  • Set aside the OIO and the OIA.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles