Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

TDS credit cannot be denied on the ground of Technical/Typographical errors

Bimal jain
Tribunal Rules TDS Credit Cannot Be Denied for Technical Errors; Orders Verification of Claimed Amounts in Form 26AS The Income Tax Appellant Tribunal in Delhi ruled that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit cannot be denied due to technical or typographical errors made by a taxpayer when filing returns. In the case involving a salaried employee, the Centralized Processing Centre initially denied a portion of the TDS credit due to discrepancies between the claimed amount and Form 26AS. The taxpayer appealed the decision, and the Tribunal found that the TDS credit was indeed reflected in Form 26AS. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the claimed amount and overturned the previous order denying the credit. (AI Summary)

The Income Tax Appellant Tribunal, Delhi (“the Tribunal”) in the case of SEJI MIYAZONO VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE-INTL. TAXATION-1 (1) (1), DELHI - 2022 (12) TMI 632 - ITAT DELHIdated October 31, 2022 held that Tax Deducted at Source (“TDS”) credit of the bona fide assessee cannot be denied in case where the assessee committed technical/typographical error during return filing.

Facts:

Seji Miyazona (“the Appellant”) is a salaried employee. For the Financial Year 2017-18, the residential status of the Appellant as per Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) was of a ‘Resident but Not ordinarily Resident’. Appellant declared income of Rs. 1,25,04,980/- in return of income for the said period and claimed credit of TDS of Rs. 42,21,551/-. Centralized Processing Centre (“CPC”) of Income tax department did not grant credit of TDS of Rs. 3,48,701/- on the ground that such amount did not match with Form 26AS.  The Income Tax department issued an intimation under Section 143(1) of the IT Act, for mismatch of the TDS amount claimed and available to be claimed as per Form 26AS. Appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) (“the CITA”) against the intimation issued under Section 143(1) of the IT Act. The CITA passed an order on August 18, 2020 (“the Order”) against the Appellant stating that impugned TDS amount is not eligible for credit due to technical/typographical error committed by the Appellant.

Aggrieved by the order passed by the CITA the Appellant filed an appeal before the Tribunal.

Issue:

Whether credit of TDS can be denied due to technical/typographical error committed by Appellant?

Held:

The Tribunal held that:

  • On perusal of Form 26AS the impugned TDS credit was reflecting, which was on the contrary to the allegation made by Income Tax department.
  • Since, the TDS was deducted from the income of the Appellant, credit of the Appellant cannot be denied due to technical/typographical error committed by the Appellant.
  • The Tribunal sent the issue back to be Assessing Officer of factual verification of the amount of the TDS claimed and reflected in From 26AS and set aside the order passed by the CITA.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Vivek Mittal on Dec 24, 2022

To make it simple, in an ideal situation assessee must have filed a rectification u/s 154 with the AO.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles