Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Suspension of GST registration is counterproductive and affects tax recovery

Bimal jain
Court Orders Immediate Revocation of GST Registration Suspension; Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Ensure Smooth Tax Recovery Process The Calcutta High Court addressed a case involving the suspension of a GST registration, which was challenged by a construction business owner. The court found that the suspension hindered business operations and tax recovery, as it prevented the issuance of invoices. It directed the assessing authority to revoke the suspension immediately and issue a show cause notice within seven days. The business owner was to be given time to respond before a final decision was made. The court emphasized the need for a pragmatic approach to avoid disrupting tax recovery processes. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in BISWESWAR MIDHYA, PROPRIETOR OF MIDHYA CONSTRUCTION VERSUS THE SUPERINTENDENT, CGST & CX RANGE V, HALDIA II DIVISION, HALDIA CGST & CX COMMISSIONERATE & ORS. - 2022 (9) TMI 120 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT disposed off the writ petition directing the assessing authority to forthwith revoke the suspension of the assessee’s registration. Further directed the assessing authority to issue show cause notice within seven days from the date of receipt of this order.

Facts:

Bisweswar Midhya (“the Appellant”) filed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice (“SCN”) dated July 21, 2022. The SCN was issuedfor cancellation of Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) registration granted to the Appellant. The primary ground on which the Appellant challenged the SCN was that there was no final order of adjudication passed by the competent assessing authority (“the Respondent”) quantifying the tax liability payable by the Appellant.

Moreover, summons were issued to the Appellant and the Appellant has been responding to the summons by submitting representations to the Respondent, but the Respondent did not proceed further pursuant to the summons. The writ petition is still pending and the direction to file affidavits has been issued. The Appellant is aggrieved by non-granting of any interim order pending disposal of the writ petition.

Therefore, the Appellant filed this intra-court appeal.

Issue:

Whether or not suspension of GST registration affects the recovery of taxes?

Held:

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in BISWESWAR MIDHYA, PROPRIETOR OF MIDHYA CONSTRUCTION VERSUS THE SUPERINTENDENT, CGST & CX RANGE V, HALDIA II DIVISION, HALDIA CGST & CX COMMISSIONERATE & ORS. - 2022 (9) TMI 120 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, held as under:

  • Stated that if the registration of the Appellant is cancelled, the Appellant cannot carry on its business in the sense that no invoice can be raised by the Appellant. This would ultimately impact the recovery of taxes. Therefore, the Respondent has to take a pragmatic view in the matter.
  • Disposed off this Intra-court appeal as well as the writ petition by directing the Respondent to revoke the suspension of the Appellant’s license and directed the Respondent to issue an SCN within seven days from the date of receipt of the server copy of this order.
  • Directed that the Appellant shall be given a reasonable time to submit his objection as against the SCN. Thereafter, the SCN shall be adjudicated and a reasoned order should be passed on merits and in accordance with the law.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles