Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Advance ruling voidance procedure requires fraud allegations to be supported and parties afforded a hearing. A representation alleging that an advance ruling was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation must include a detailed statement of facts and particulars of evidence and be submitted in the prescribed multiple copies. Upon receipt, the Authority must serve the applicant with the representation, issue a notice, and afford the applicant and the Commissioner a reasonable opportunity to rebut the allegations and to be heard before passing any order declaring the advance ruling void.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Advance ruling voidance procedure requires fraud allegations to be supported and parties afforded a hearing.
A representation alleging that an advance ruling was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation must include a detailed statement of facts and particulars of evidence and be submitted in the prescribed multiple copies. Upon receipt, the Authority must serve the applicant with the representation, issue a notice, and afford the applicant and the Commissioner a reasonable opportunity to rebut the allegations and to be heard before passing any order declaring the advance ruling void.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.