Pre-retirement employee review may recommend retirement for doubtful integrity or persistent ineffectiveness after committee assessment. Employees must be reviewed shortly before reaching the statutory age or service tenure on a quarterly schedule. A three-member committee evaluates integrity and effectiveness: doubtful integrity warrants retirement; ineffectiveness may warrant retirement subject to fitness and competence and ordinarily considering only the recent service period or period in a higher post if promoted. No temporal limitation applies where integrity is in question. Committee recommendations are referred to an appropriate Board authority not below the committee chairman.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Pre-retirement employee review may recommend retirement for doubtful integrity or persistent ineffectiveness after committee assessment.
Employees must be reviewed shortly before reaching the statutory age or service tenure on a quarterly schedule. A three-member committee evaluates integrity and effectiveness: doubtful integrity warrants retirement; ineffectiveness may warrant retirement subject to fitness and competence and ordinarily considering only the recent service period or period in a higher post if promoted. No temporal limitation applies where integrity is in question. Committee recommendations are referred to an appropriate Board authority not below the committee chairman.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.