Reply requirement: file multiple copies and expressly admit or deny whether formulated questions of law arise from the order. Rule 33 requires the respondent's reply to be filed in quintuplicate and to expressly admit or deny whether any formulated question of law arises out of the order. If a formulated question is defective, the reply must specify the defects and state the exact question of law that arises. The reply must include a particulars list of documents the respondent believes should form part of the case and provide English translations where necessary.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Reply requirement: file multiple copies and expressly admit or deny whether formulated questions of law arise from the order.
Rule 33 requires the respondent's reply to be filed in quintuplicate and to expressly admit or deny whether any formulated question of law arises out of the order. If a formulated question is defective, the reply must specify the defects and state the exact question of law that arises. The reply must include a particulars list of documents the respondent believes should form part of the case and provide English translations where necessary.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.