Presumption of culpable mental state shifts evidentiary burden but allows defence to prove lack of mens rea. The court shall presume the existence of a culpable mental state in prosecutions under the Act requiring such an element, but it is a defence for the accused to prove absence of that mental state regarding the charged act; the term includes intention, motive, knowledge, and belief or reason to believe, and a fact is proved only when the court believes it exists beyond reasonable doubt.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Presumption of culpable mental state shifts evidentiary burden but allows defence to prove lack of mens rea.
The court shall presume the existence of a culpable mental state in prosecutions under the Act requiring such an element, but it is a defence for the accused to prove absence of that mental state regarding the charged act; the term includes intention, motive, knowledge, and belief or reason to believe, and a fact is proved only when the court believes it exists beyond reasonable doubt.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.