Presumption of culpable mental state: court presumes mens rea, accused may rebut by proving absence. Where a culpable mental state is an element of an offence, the court shall presume its existence, but the accused may defend by proving absence of that mental state. Culpable mental state includes intention, motive, knowledge, and belief or reason to believe. A fact is treated as proved only when the court believes it exists beyond reasonable doubt.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Presumption of culpable mental state: court presumes mens rea, accused may rebut by proving absence.
Where a culpable mental state is an element of an offence, the court shall presume its existence, but the accused may defend by proving absence of that mental state. Culpable mental state includes intention, motive, knowledge, and belief or reason to believe. A fact is treated as proved only when the court believes it exists beyond reasonable doubt.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.