Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Acts & Rules
of of All Acts & Rules
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Removal of company names from register u/s248(1): excluded categories, written Form STK-1 notice, 30-day reply</h1> The rule empowers the Registrar to remove a company's name from the register suo motu under section 248(1); effect: companies meeting removal criteria may be struck off. It prescribes categorical exclusions-listed companies; delisted for non-compliance; vanishing companies (defined); companies subject to inspection/investigation or pending prosecutions; those with pending notices/inquiries under specified sections; companies with pending prosecutions or compounding applications; firms with outstanding public deposits or unsatisfied charges; and section-8 companies-which cannot be removed. It mandates issuance of a written notice in Form STK-1 to all directors by registered/speed post stating reasons and inviting representations and supporting documents within 30 days.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
