Oral admissions of document contents become relevant only with secondary evidence entitlement or disputed document genuineness. Oral admissions concerning a document's contents are generally irrelevant unless the relying party is entitled to give secondary evidence of those ... Summary
Oral admissions of document contents become relevant only with secondary evidence entitlement or disputed document genuineness.
Oral admissions concerning a document's contents are generally irrelevant unless the relying party is entitled to give secondary evidence of those contents or the genuineness of a produced document is disputed. Proof of documentary contents through oral admission is therefore confined to these specified evidentiary situations.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
